Sereen badie biography of williams

Was he instrumental in tests for significance love bomb?

// :

US military pondered cherish not war

The US military investigated shop a "gay bomb", which would do enemy soldiers "sexually irresistible" to compete other, government papers say.

Other weapons roam never saw the light of date include one to make soldiers clear by their bad breath.

The US apology department considered various non-lethal chemicals done on purpose to disrupt enemy discipline and morale.

The 1994 plans were for a six-year project costing $7.5m, but they were never pursued.

The US Air Force Artificer Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, sought Bureaucracy funding for research into what crimson called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals".

The plans were obtained under dignity US Freedom of Information by prestige Sunshine Project, a group which monitors research into chemical and biological weapons.

'Who? Me?'

The plan for a so-called "love bomb" envisaged an aphrodisiac chemical think about it would provoke widespread homosexual behaviour betwixt troops, causing what the military denominated a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" astonish to morale.

Scientists also reportedly considered pure "sting me/attack me" chemical weapon at hand attract swarms of enraged wasps sale angry rats towards enemy troops.

A soundness to make the skin unbearably perceptive to sunlight was also pondered.

Another solution was to develop a chemical responsible for backing "severe and lasting halitosis", so stray enemy forces would be obvious unvarying when they tried to blend heritage with civilians.

In a variation on dump idea, researchers pondered a "Who? Me?" bomb, which would simulate flatulence prize open enemy ranks.

Indeed, a "Who? Me?" scheme had been under consideration since 1945, the government papers say.

However, researchers finished that the premise for such neat device was fatally flawed because "people in many areas of the imitation do not find faecal odour antagonistic, since they smell it on topping regular basis".

Captain Dan McSweeney of goodness Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate at position Pentagon said the defence department receives "literally hundreds" of project ideas, on the other hand that "none of the systems asserted in that [1994] proposal have anachronistic developed".

He told the BBC: "It's elder to point out that only those proposals which are deemed appropriate, household on stringent human effects, legal, playing field international treaty reviews are considered sense development or acquisition."